In previous entries I have talked about cost-containment and I recently realized that perhaps this topic needs some more clarification. Cost-containment is a buzz-word used by many in this industry and different players have different versions of what they bring to the table in terms of value. While they all offer good solutions, sometimes the simplest of models are overlooked. To support this, I ask the following…
What costs can you yourself as a business owner truly contain when it comes to health benefits?
For many, the answer is nothing. But think for a minute about what you pay and what it is used for. You pay a premium for health insurance much like you would a premium for auto insurance. The big difference is what you pay to have covered. Let’s assume your body is like a 2008 Volkswagen Passat. It has tires (or teeth) to grip the road. It also requires regular maintenance (like massage therapy or acupuncture) to keep it running and to prevent wear. Ten years down the road, you may need to spend money on a new engine not covered under warranty (like elective surgery) to keep it going for a few more years. In case you get into an accident, you buy insurance to protect you from the unforeseen and to give you the money you need to get the car back into working condition. Similarly, your body could become stricken with Cancer or Diabetes where you need drugs to help fight the disease and keep you in working condition as well.
The big difference here is that the last item, the unforeseen, is truly the only item you need to buy insurance for when it comes to your car. You don’t buy maintenance insurance or tire insurance as these are predictable expenses and it would not make sense to pay an insurance premium for something you already know you are going to need. Mind you, some form of fixed rate gas insurance might have been a good idea these days! The issue today is that we don’t treat the protection of our bodies the same way we do our cars. We insure the entire package, tires, maintenance and collision. Further, we choose a low-deductible so that we pay a higher premium unlike our cars where we tend to choose a higher one given the risk and the balance we are willing to take between upfront costs and unforeseen costs.
This is where I believe that the basics of cost-containment should be focused. For every day medical costs, we should be paying them out of our pocket in real dollars. After all, if you know that your teeth need to be cleaned every 6 months, why would you buy insurance for it and pay an inflated premium? It is going to happen just like a new set of Winter tires every November or an oil change. Instead, you should be using a more sensible financing vehicle to pay for the predictable medical costs and only purchasing insurance for the unforeseen, like Cancer, Heart Disease, or Diabetes.
To pay for the predictable costs, a Health Spending Account is the ideal solution. You can control the amount you spend and benefit from the tax savings. Secondly, you can contain the rising costs of premiums by taking away the claims you used to run through the plan and leave it for drug-only – the unforeseen costs if you will. If you are in decent health, you may wish to get a higher deductible drug plan, further reducing the premium you pay. The deductible amount can always be run through your HSA, so you are not loosing by doing this. If anything, you are saving even more money in taxes, a win-win solution.
Well, there you have it – my thoughts on cost-containment. I could have talked about per visit maximums, generic drug replacement, or electronic card adjudication and fraud monitoring. But the reality is that cost-containment really begins with the employer using the simplest of philosophies. Of course, it helps if you know a bit about cars in my analogy.
You must be logged in to post a comment.